Has Big Tech gone too far policing speech?

AgainstNuancedFor

4 Censorship gone too far3 It's complicated1 Moderation is necessary

Censorship gone too far

4 shows

Big Tech's control over media and speech is dangerous, necessitating the repeal of Section 230 to hold companies accountable for user-generated content.MeidasTouchThe Joe Rogan ExperienceBanning individuals like Morgan Murphy for expressing feminist views while allowing the Taliban on Twitter exemplifies Big Tech's inconsistent and excessive policing of speech.Play the clipThe Jimmy Dore ShowBig Tech has weaponized censorship, particularly against leftist voices, undermining free speech rights as seen in the suppression of channels and the ongoing control over critics.Play the clipSecular TalkBig Tech has gone too far in policing speech, as their actions contribute to increased political radicalization and societal division, with figures like Ari Shafir exemplifying the extremism that arises from unchecked online expression.Play the clip

It's complicated

3 shows

Social media platforms should have the right to moderate content as they see fit, but their monopolistic power raises concerns about free speech in the public square.Chris WilliamsonTriggernometryBig Tech has gone too far in policing speech, as evidenced by the global impact of their platforms, which can escalate issues from children's exposure to civil unrest, highlighting the need for better regulation.Play the clipJulian DoreyBig Tech has not gone too far in policing speech; platforms like ex-Twitter are now more open, allowing both good and bad speech to coexist, which is essential for true free speech.Play the clip

Moderation is necessary

1 show

The lack of regulation on tech platforms allows them to manipulate speech and amplify conflict, undermining true freedom of expression.Breakfast Club Power 105.1 FM

AI-generated from each show's transcript. Play any moment to hear it in context.